RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01802
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 25 Mar 13, be declared void
and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System
(AFFMS).
2. The Fitness Assessments (FA) dated 19 Mar 12 and 12 Dec 12 be
declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management
System (AFFMS) [Administratively corrected by Fitness Assessment
Appeals Board decision].
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Due to surgery to right knee and right shoulder, he was unable
to successfully obtain a minimum passing score on the cardio
component of the contested FA.
In support of the appeal, the applicant submits AF Form 108,
three AF Form 422s, and four AF Form 469s.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of master sergeant (E-7).
On 25 Mar 13, applicant participated in the contested FA and
attained an unsatisfactory score (33.33) completing all four
components.
On 3 Apr 13, AF Form 108 documented the applicant could not pass
the FA administered 25 Mar 13 due to medical condition.
On 4 Apr 13, applicants PCM updated AF Form 469 restricting him
from lifting more than 10 pounds and the run, walk, and push-up
portions of the FA.
On 22 Jan 14, a similar request was considered by the Fitness
Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB). The FAAB removed the 19 Dec 12
and 12 Dec 12 FAs but denied the removal of the 25 Mar 13 FA on
the basis the applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence to
warrant removal.
The applicants last eight FA results are as follows:
Date
Composite
Score
Rating
13 Nov 13
100
Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU)
9 May 13
100
Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU)
*25 Mar 13
33.33
Unsatisfactory (Exempt from PU)
*12 Dec 12
-
Removed by FAAB 22 Jan 14
28 Jun 12
100
Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU)
*19 Mar 12
-
Removed by FAAB 22 Jan 14
2 Aug 11
84.70
Satisfactory
28 Apr 11
77.90
Unsatisfactory (minimum SU)
* Contested FA
In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-
2905 (1 Jul 10), Paragraph 2.3.2., All members must complete
the FSQ prior to FA (Attachment 4).
In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-
2905 (1 Jul 10), Paragraph 2.3.2.1, The FSQ should be completed
no earlier than 30 calendar days (90 days for ARC), but NLT 7
days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when
indicated. Note: Failure to complete FSQ does not invalidate the
FA.
In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-
2905 (1 Jul 10), Paragraph 2.3.2.2, A medical provider must
evaluate all members with health issues identified on the FSQ
prior to the FA. Member must notify the UFPM of the
assessment/training clearance status from the provider. The
provider or ARC MLO completes the bottom portion of the FSQ or
the Medical Clearance Letter (MCL) if the member has no
limitations (Attachment 10 or 11) and an AF Form 469, if
applicable.
In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-
2905 (1 Jul 10), Attachment 4, Fitness Screening Questionnaire:
1. Have you experienced any of the symptoms/problems listed
below and not been medically evaluated and cleared for
unrestricted participation in a physical training program?
- Unexplained chest discomfort with or without exertion
- Unusual or unexplained shortness of breath
- Dizziness, fainting, or blackouts associated with exertion
- Other medical problems that may prevent you from safely
participating in this test
- Yes: Stop. Notify your UFPM and contact your PCP/MLO for
evaluation/ recommendations (or for ARC, contact the MLO for
Duty Limiting Conditions (DLC) documentation and referral to
PCP).
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends granting relief for the 25 Mar 13 FA
because the member was assessed on components he should have
been exempt.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments,
is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 9 Feb 14 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the
applicants contentions, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
contested FA should be declared void. Although the applicant has
not provided a letter from his commander invalidating the FA, he
has provided an AF Form 108 signed by his medical provider and
an AF Form 469 indicating that he had a medical condition and
that precluded him from passing the contested FA. Given his
medical providers recommendation to invalidate the FA and the
exemptions that have been granted to him in the past due to his
ongoing medical condition, we find a totality of the evidence
supports favorable consideration of this request. Therefore, we
recommend the applicants records be corrected as indicated
below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that the
Fitness Assessment, dated 25 March 2013 be declared void and
removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-01802 in Executive Session on 30 Apr 14, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Apr 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 15 Oct 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Feb 14.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03162
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score AC Component Rating 11 Jun 13 Exempt Exempt Exempt all four categories *29 May 13 0.0 36.00/0.00 Unsatisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 29 Oct 12 85.50 32.50/17.10 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 23 Apr 12 100.00 31.00/20.00 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 31 Oct 11 79.50 33.50/15.90 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01688
The applicants last six FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 3 Mar 14 85.00 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 9 Sep 13 96.38 Excellent (Exempt from PU/SU) 7 Mar 13 87.63 Satisfactory (Exempt from PU/SU) 11 Sep 12 82.00 Satisfactory (Exempt from PU/SU) 30 Apr 12 82.00 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) *31 Jan 12 72.63 Unsatisfactory (Exempt from PU/SU) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_AFGM3 (3 Jan 12),...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04146
A similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant did not provide any documentation describing the injury and why he could not pass the contested FAs. If the FA is invalidated, the Airman will be required to retest on all non-exempt FA components within five duty days from original FA test date. NOTE: Original FA will count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander. In accordance with guidance at the time of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04196
Recommend invalidation of FA in question. A similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant should not have completed the FA due to injury. NOTE: Original FA will count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander. In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905 (1 Jul 10), Paragraph 2.3.2., All members must complete the FSQ prior to FA (Attachment 4). In accordance with guidance at the time of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03968
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 29 Aug 13 95.75 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio) *30 May 13 37.00 Unsatisfactory (0 Points for Cardio) 29 Nov 12 76.30 Satisfactory 5 May 12 84.90 Satisfactory 5 Jan 12 98.50 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_AFGM5 (3 Jan 13), Attachment 1, Section 10, Paragraph b, If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury and provides...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03506
On 12 Apr 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained an unsatisfactory score (37.00) completing all four components. If the FA is invalidated, the Airman will be required to retest on all non-exempt FA components within five duty days from original FA test date. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01755
For non-AGR ARC, Airmen will be required to retest the next date they are in appropriate military duty status and official FAs are being conducted. In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905 (1 Jul 10), Paragraph 2.3.2., All members must complete the FSQ prior to FA (Attachment 4). In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905 (1 Jul 10), Paragraph 2.3.2.1, The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days (90 days for ARC), but...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05833
After the FA the applicant visited his medical provider and was given a corrected profile. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to void/remove the FA dated 25 Jan 13. While the AFI does state that a member who is using albuterol medication should be exempt on the walk component, the applicant did not provide justification that would prove he was taking the medication at the time of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02467
On 2 Jan 14, the request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of Insufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422 and medical documentation from an Air Force doctor. In accordance with (IAW) guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_ Fitness Program AFGM5 (3 Jan 13), Attachment 1, Section 10, If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02337
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02337 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 20 Dec 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In support of her appeal she submits an AF Form 469 Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 11 Mar 13, indicating she...